Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.quux.org!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: sci.logic
Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers
 (extra-ordinary)
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 22:56:13 -0500
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <1b362da835d3b53518785e74b2b5a0d540d85a2a@i2pn2.org>
References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me> <vhhr6f$1q0r9$1@dont-email.me>
 <ffa63cb5-8898-4aa7-80eb-8b2c51c9986d@att.net> <vhkhun$28qt$1@dont-email.me>
 <vhmtph$j1ek$1@dont-email.me> <vhn1jk$jf6v$1@dont-email.me>
 <vhn3po$jvo1$1@dont-email.me> <vhn420$jf6v$3@dont-email.me>
 <vhpg51$13soc$1@dont-email.me> <vhpnrb$15239$1@dont-email.me>
 <vhs2gn$1kjtc$1@dont-email.me> <vhs4ue$1ku9t$1@dont-email.me>
 <vhv6or$280s6$1@dont-email.me> <vhvbjb$28n6o$1@dont-email.me>
 <vi1dbj$2moon$1@dont-email.me> <vi224l$2pgrd$1@dont-email.me>
 <vi4383$3csd4$2@dont-email.me> <vi4a6c$3dt4s$2@dont-email.me>
 <vi6p1l$3uoti$1@dont-email.me> <vi6unr$3v0dn$5@dont-email.me>
 <vihd3l$2d9fk$1@dont-email.me> <vihfai$2cnof$1@dont-email.me>
 <5fd3a3383a63f58046d6e60525a24bad13dd8128@i2pn2.org>
 <vii455$2kq21$1@dont-email.me>
 <3b8608c0c7b170243fa70ba3d925f1d9d148f84d@i2pn2.org>
 <vikhiu$3cdhn$1@dont-email.me>
 <fb6998ef216491328f60dd9c50214a55f061cf47@i2pn2.org>
 <vj6vke$elqh$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 03:56:13 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2123377"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vj6vke$elqh$3@dont-email.me>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 3148
Lines: 29

On 12/9/24 9:42 AM, WM wrote:
> On 08.12.2024 21:29, joes wrote:
>> Am Mon, 02 Dec 2024 15:52:16 +0100 schrieb WM:
>>> On 01.12.2024 18:38, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>> On 12/1/24 11:50 AM, WM wrote:
>>>>> On 01.12.2024 13:14, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>> On 12/1/24 5:55 AM, WM wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> The relative covering for every interval is 1/10, independent of the
>>>>>>> configuration of the hats available inside. The limit of this
>>>>>>> sequence is 1/10.
>>>>>> Which just shows that you are using naive mathematics that is just
>>>>>> inconsistant.
>>>>> Mathematics is consistent, set theory is not.
>>>> But Mathematics is based on set theory,
>>> Not at all. This is only claimed by set theorists. Mathematics is based
>>> upon potential infinity. Merely some symbols of finite set theory like ∈
>>> ℕ ∪ ∩ ⊆ have turned out useful.
>> Lol. Mathematics is axiomatised as ZFC, no mention of „potential”.
> 
> That is a lie of matheologians.
> 
> Regards, WM
> 

No, it shows the lie of Mueckenheim who doesn't know where he gets his 
rules to work by.

You just don't understand the limits of the rules you are trying to use, 
because you mind is just too small.