Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: sci.logic
Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers
 (extra-ordinary)
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 10:16:40 -0500
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <c1f435672c4e9bbc6a357dcee2f15d6922d48f71@i2pn2.org>
References: <31419fde-62b3-46f3-89f6-a48f1fe82bc0@att.net>
 <vi4a6c$3dt4s$2@dont-email.me>
 <c5a03e73203e6409f6b50c25b84a22d8df0d210b@i2pn2.org>
 <vi4k5a$3fj1t$1@dont-email.me>
 <8b860c66587b6d5d18e565caddb42cc3d5bb813c@i2pn2.org>
 <vi4vg4$3hg8t$3@dont-email.me> <vi509b$3hqcp$1@dont-email.me>
 <vi56el$3is82$1@dont-email.me> <vi57p2$3j62u$1@dont-email.me>
 <vi6tu2$3v0dn$3@dont-email.me>
 <bedba0f79694c3adbbcb4eff22a28b9597ea1293@i2pn2.org>
 <vi7uam$5cmb$1@dont-email.me>
 <376546bee4809e20528e0e9481315611ec5c3848@i2pn2.org>
 <vi9n75$hepc$1@dont-email.me>
 <659cb7a16573c854e96c7a982fe8b15397fb1210@i2pn2.org>
 <vi9u2d$ig6a$1@dont-email.me>
 <566c43c9af9113a8654a25c54ff6d60fbe982784@i2pn2.org>
 <via4jv$jk72$1@dont-email.me>
 <b7f357ab699a666d92da2a36021d0c8948232b1f@i2pn2.org>
 <viaaga$jk72$5@dont-email.me>
 <621b95c8deb04df2cb53e3bfa9f3a60e4b84458c@i2pn2.org>
 <d0d39b61-0943-48ba-9971-9c43eebfc1b5@tha.de>
 <85e0893a25e83c8407149ef84012fdfa4c65aa05@i2pn2.org>
 <vichvo$13m17$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 15:16:41 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="479760"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
In-Reply-To: <vichvo$13m17$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 3193
Lines: 31

On 11/29/24 9:10 AM, WM wrote:
> On 29.11.2024 14:57, Richard Damon wrote:
>> On 11/29/24 8:44 AM, WM wrote:
>>> On 29.11.2024 01:06, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>> On 11/28/24 12:50 PM, WM wrote:
>>>>> If for all intervals 1, 2, 3, ..., n the covering is 1/10, then 
>>>>> there are no natnumbers outside of all intervals and there are no hats
>>>>> outside of all intervals.
>>>
>>>> You are making the error of assuming that the infinite set is just 
>>>> like a finite set that has part of it.
>>>
>>> No. Analysis concerns infinite sequences and sets.
>>
>> You are looking at FINITE sets, and then trying to extrapolate to an 
>> infinte set, which doesn't work.
> 
> Analysis shows the way. If it differs from set theory, then one of both 
> is wrong.
> 
> Regards, WM
> 

But set theory doesn't say anything that you are saying.

Nothing in set theory talks about the equivalence of properties of the 
infinite set to the properties of the finite sets that you are trying to 
"take the limit of".

Sorry, you are just showing your ignorance of how logic actually works, 
and ard just spouting off buzz words that you tnink make it sound like 
you know what you are talking about, but you clearly don't.