Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics
Subject: Re: will trump have the balls....
Followup-To: sci.physics
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 10:58:00 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 39
Message-ID: <mefp1l-1u041.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
References: <89e144db18eec85ca16937f2503d37c7@www.novabbs.com> <0042eeb5943f0a87a4fda403264395fc@www.novabbs.com> <6m5p1l-9jc31.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <vicpmg$14vll$1@dont-email.me> <5621f4adec9336041f1ca8fd1aa65023@www.novabbs.com>
Injection-Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 20:01:04 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="71242fa4e97e024b9cb8958daaf4eca7";
	logging-data="1281858"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/ofLS4RRIh3JgmBOYkoqKp"
User-Agent: tin/2.6.2-20220130 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.0-126-lowlatency (x86_64))
Cancel-Lock: sha1:9DdX6JoqPgVGArUxSrDdWqxQfhk=
Bytes: 2641

In sci.physics Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Nov 2024 16:21:35 +0000, wugi wrote:
> 
>> Op 29/11/2024 om 13:11 schreef Jim Pennino:
>>> In sci.physics Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 26 Nov 2024 16:41:39 +0000, bertietaylor wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> ...to say that relativity and quantum are bollocks?
>>>>
>>>> Very much doubt that, at the moment. If any politician could say
>>>
>>> Only delusionally insane crackpots think that what a politician says
>>> is relevant.
>>
>> Again, some politicians like Trump thrive on crackpottery, so he could
>> gladly adhere to such statements.
> 
> So long as the e=mcc frauds are defunded. What can be better!

You mean frauds like the world wide GNSS system that has been working
exactly as predicted by conventional physics for over 30 years now,
crackpot?

Or do you mean frauds like nuclear reactors that have been working
exactly as predicted by conventional physics for over 80 years now,
crackpot?

Or do you mean frauds like radar systems that have been working exactly
as predicted by conventional physics for over 120 years now, crackpot?

Or do you mean frauds like the cathode ray tube that has been working
exactly as predicted by conventional physics for over 125 years now,
crackpot?

Or do you mean frauds like the electric generator that has been working
exactly as predicted by conventional physics for over 190 years now,
crackpot?