Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: The Natural Philosopher Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 09:18:50 +0000 Organization: A little, after lunch Lines: 28 Message-ID: References: <1b166410-ecc1-f9e5-7218-cde9618f4686@example.net> <77840736-c143-e896-5da0-d0afae4915ed@example.net> <2118139f-4451-560b-5094-a3d61c05f0d3@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 10:18:51 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="324bccc9bb11dd88d68685d631659c8b"; logging-data="511750"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18tUlmrF9/+Cytg7EDH257JBW28I6+HFuQ=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:OON75oQf8i1SccITvmySw48Og7s= Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: Bytes: 2607 On 27/11/2024 19:12, rbowman wrote: > On Wed, 27 Nov 2024 11:58:35 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > >> I've encountered that in my time in mil spec aerospace. >> A very few people analysed the project and broke it down in to circuit >> board specs. > > I worked on one DoD project in my career. I got bored and wandered off > after 6 months of wrangling about the spec. About a year later I talked to > one of the programmers who had stayed and asked if they'd written any code > yet. "Nope." > > So much blood, sweat, tears, and ego involvement is involved in specs like > that it will be implemented even if it becomes apparent it isn't going to > work. Fiascos like the F-35 don't surprise me at all. The amazing thing was that random monkeys did in the end through a process of iteration 'hit upon the right thing, after exhausting every other alternative' -- For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. H.L.Mencken