Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED.mailhub.linuxsc.com!not-for-mail
From: Tim Rentsch
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: question about linker
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2024 06:33:39 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <86a5dakxmk.fsf@linuxsc.com>
References: <20241129142810.00007920@yahoo.com> <20241129161517.000010b8@yahoo.com> <87ldwx10gv.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <87ttbj12ec.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <87a5db0ymo.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="mailhub.linuxsc.com:45.79.96.183";
logging-data="1730095"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:TAKIwmq8UmaYeevC3QGISgpk1/4=
Bytes: 2318
Keith Thompson writes:
> Bart writes:
>
>> On 04/12/2024 22:58, Keith Thompson wrote:
>>
>>> Bart writes:
>>>
>>>> OK, if it's so simple, explain it to me.
>>>
>>> I'll pretend that was a sincere question.
>>
>> Let's put it this way: if somebody asked me what the rule was, I
>> wouldn't be able to tell them.
>
> Probably because there's no single rule. As I wrote, "{" and "}"
> are used in different contexts with different meanings. (So are
> "(", ")", ";", and "static".) I have no particular expectation
> that there should be a single rule covering all the cases, just
> because they happen to use the same symbol.
>
> A reasonable person would have ackowledged that I've at least
> tried to answer your question.
For the record I appreciate your efforts to answer Bart's C
questions.