Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Julio Di Egidio Newsgroups: sci.logic Subject: Re: intuitionistic vs. classical implication in Prolog code Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2024 12:57:36 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 9 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2024 12:57:38 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="8b87f2f7e098ae75aa40ba304ec8e6fd"; logging-data="3453155"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+sBEsHAY3vYDgG1AHi666aDCEbRSElGd4=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:oGY1jbGzaib3bld3UKjagg/6H68= Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: Bytes: 1414 On 02/12/2024 09:31, Mild Shock wrote: > How does one usually demonstrate > Glivenkos theorem? Usually with a semantics: we have already said that up-thread... -Julio