Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: [OT] What's next for Kamala Harris?
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 13:04:16 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 35
Message-ID: <vhqh30$19d7a$3@dont-email.me>
References: <vh8cne$387qj$2@dont-email.me> <1534794062.753750234.511942.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com> <vhktkk$5304$1@dont-email.me> <e8vvjj1od9mgrdm2mqgu12e4ttqds2nnpu@4ax.com> <vhq7vg$17d85$4@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 19:04:17 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="200ff8d44eef264733e075479e1f3cbd";
	logging-data="1357034"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19T1ZdMFVydN8rY+3qB/vIzlBFxLsBWqUA="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:+fyIhr4ZhQjjnkMdVTwTXPTaTPY=
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.12N (x86 32bit)
Bytes: 2445

In article <vhq7vg$17d85$4@dont-email.me>, ahk@chinet.com wrote:
> The Horny Goat <lcraver@home.ca> wrote:
>>Wed, 20 Nov 2024 09:59:09 -0500, Nyssa <Nyssa@LogicalInsight.net> wrote:

>>>If he wasn't and was referring to the idiot polling place person who
>>>bitched about his red hat, that's okay too. At least the election 
>>>folks will be aware of what happened and give some better training
>>>to others in future elections. . . . 
>>
>>That's how I read it and such a hat wouldn't be allowed inside the
>>polling station in Canada since it's not allowed to wear anything that
>>indicates how you're voting inside the station. Outside of course is a
>>different story with the only exception being you're not allowed to
>>set up a gauntlet voters have to go through to enter the polling
>>station.
>>
>>I would assume most sane people would consider a red MAGA hat as
>>indicating how you're voting. (Unlike the "I voted!" stickers they
>>often offer you on the way out)
>
>The baseball cap he wore wasn't a MAGA hat.
>
>C'mon, H.G. I don't believe for a moment that electioneering laws in
>your country are significantly different than in ours.
>
>No one can claim that a red baseball cap is an exclusive symbol of the
>Republican Party. It was a college's color and had a college's logo on it.

Actually, it was a sports team, as was the blue one.

[Kerman's incorrect formatting fixed.]

--
Not a joke! Don't jump!