From: Farley Flud Subject: Re: Hard Drive Failure Reprise Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 23 Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.usenetexpress.com!not-for-mail Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2024 23:05:24 +0000 Nntp-Posting-Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2024 23:05:24 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 1176 X-Complaints-To: abuse@usenetexpress.com Organization: UsenetExpress - www.usenetexpress.com Bytes: 1495 On Sun, 8 Dec 2024 15:44:56 -0600, Physfitfreak wrote: > > The two views you mentioned seem to me could be one and the same thing. > How so? If a metallic structure is grounded, it cannot develop a static charge. But, in flowing air, the stagnant boundary layer is always present. That's also the reason that dust cannot be removed by a blast of compressed air. The only way to remove it is through mechanical action via a brush. We need to get some aerodynamicists involved in this issue. -- Systemd: solving all the problems that you never knew you had.