Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Frank Krygowski Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech Subject: Re: Todays rant Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 11:29:42 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 22 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: frkrygow@gmail.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2024 17:29:44 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="6ece163a41deccdef8386aea131853f6"; logging-data="504363"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX190h54El0Ywyu+516hso66Lb9a4ym24D3U=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:ylS9n1dqmKhAr2ww5927fRb5Ga0= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Bytes: 2365 On 12/9/2024 6:51 AM, John B. wrote: > >>> >>> My statement stands: Anyone who needs rapid fire to take a deer is an >>> incompetent slob. >>> >>> You hunted deer, correct? How many times did you shoot more than, say, >>> even five shots within 30 seconds after first seeing a deer? Please do >>> answer! >> > Well, to answerer Frankie, back in my younger days I could kill a > woodchuck, never tried a deer, with one shot ,at a measured 100 yards, > with a S&W 38. pistol, so when Frankie asks " did 'you' shoot " he's > asking an expert, not Mr.Average Shooter, so his question is, at best, > facetious. My statement stands. Are you _really_ trying to defend the idea of having to blast away at a deer, multiple fast shots, to kill it? I think most hunters would find that horrific. I could ask some if you like. -- - Frank Krygowski