Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!panix!.POSTED.panix2.panix.com!panix2.panix.com!not-for-mail
From: kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written
Subject: Re: Whoops! The Atlantic Makes Trump Look EPIC In Cover Intended as a Smear
Date: 5 Oct 2024 14:35:58 -0000
Organization: Former users of Netcom shell (1989-2000)
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <vdrise$lhh$1@panix2.panix.com>
References: <20240913a@crcomp.net> <vdn6l6$fip$1@panix2.panix.com> <vFGLO.120073$WtV9.87808@fx10.iad> <vdnlle$313t$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Info: reader1.panix.com; posting-host="panix2.panix.com:166.84.1.2";
	logging-data="12636"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com"
Bytes: 1425

Mike Van Pelt  <usenet@mikevanpelt.com> wrote:
>I hesitate to mention hemp (since my impression is that most
>of the people pushing hemp are really more interested in the
>wacky tabaky variety) but hemp (the non-psychoactive kind)
>does have some seriously good points. It's fast growing,
>nitrogen fixing, produces what's apparently a good quality
>fiber, and if you grow a big excess and bury the excess...
>I think it would be pulling carbon out of the air faster
>than trees, which are pretty slow growing.
>
>There may be other plants that are even better at this. 

Hemp is good stuff but so are soybeans!
--scott
-- 
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."