Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Tim Rentsch
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: else ladders practice
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 10:50:25 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <86ttbvqham.fsf@linuxsc.com>
References: <3deb64c5b0ee344acd9fbaea1002baf7302c1e8f@i2pn2.org> <87wmgsmme0.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <87sergmhkc.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <87bjy3mg71.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 19:50:26 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d0fcbf139f066190487faadf13f2576f";
logging-data="3084915"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19vDlHcikaF/SGQQjanCiHNOIvcRvgXCg0="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:oe3orFbCgRoZyHYEyQ7MZpRhIzc=
sha1:7/pWCT7RtbpOCmQd6xYc0368ij0=
Bytes: 1976
Bart writes:
> On 25/11/2024 16:27, Keith Thompson wrote:
>
>> Bart, can you explain the difference between a C compiler and a C
>> implementation? Or do you believe they're the same thing? (Hint:
>> They're not.)
>
> Well, I write language implementations, and I consider them largely
> the same thing.
>
> So who's right?
In comp.lang.c, the C standard is right.