Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de>
Newsgroups: sci.logic
Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 11:50:22 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <vjp0lf$13ar5$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me> <vg7vgh$csek$1@dont-email.me>
 <vg8911$dvd6$1@dont-email.me> <vjgvpc$3bb3f$1@dont-email.me>
 <vjh28r$3b6vi$4@dont-email.me> <vjjfmj$3tuuh$1@dont-email.me>
 <vjjgds$3tvsg$2@dont-email.me>
 <539edbdf516d69a3f1207687b802be7a86bd3b48@i2pn2.org>
 <vjk97t$1tms$1@dont-email.me> <vjmc7h$hl7j$1@dont-email.me>
 <vjmd6c$hn65$2@dont-email.me> <vjosno$12p56$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 11:50:24 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="8cb16b437f3efafb0eb1892e9ae812c7";
	logging-data="1157989"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/qMkKOjz+6srYCAeZsERZ0nES7qN/yrJQ="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:LdG+8P841UkkTLYq2MCI+XscmKw=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vjosno$12p56$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2262

On 16.12.2024 10:43, Mikko wrote:
> On 2024-12-15 11:05:48 +0000, WM said:
> 
>> On 15.12.2024 11:49, Mikko wrote:
>>> On 2024-12-14 15:46:04 +0000, WM said:
>>>
>>>> On 14.12.2024 12:06, joes wrote:
>>
>>>>> They are ALREADY there.
>>>>
>>>> Therefore they cannot appear after the cursor has passed their 
>>>> positions. Every interval and every end of an interval would be hit 
>>>> by the cursor.
>>>
>>> Yes, but not before another interval hits the cursor.
>>
>> You believe that only afterwards the first interval comes into being?
>> That is not the infinity used in set theory.
> 
> There is no time in mathematics. Nothing happens. In particular, nothing
> comes into being.

Then your sentence "Yes, but not before another interval hits the 
cursor." is false.

Regards, WM
>