Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connectionsPath: ...!news.mixmin.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!reader5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Mild Shock Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: para-governemental institution of violence (Re: "superhumaness" excels "stackoverflow reputation") Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2024 11:41:04 +0100 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2024 10:41:03 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: solani.org; logging-data="288983"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@news.solani.org" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.19 Cancel-Lock: sha1:1mQPH7/xN7dmOWH3KBZMELkRmDM= In-Reply-To: X-User-ID: eJwFwQcBwDAMAzBKdZ1XOFkOfwiTlAYrF1MTXd2ertZ55+b47AaOkszETN4r6bogDilv40E+CbSwwodf9Q9sohW3 Bytes: 4071 Lines: 94 Hi, > Chatgpt is definitely unreliable. So is stackoverflow, you have no guarantee to get a realiable answer. Sometimes they have even biased nonsense, due to the over representation of certain communities on stackoverflow. But ChatGPT it is easier to re-iterate a problem and explore solutions, you don't get punished for sloppy questions, or changing topic midflight exploring corner digging deeper and deeper. ChatGPT certainly beats stackoverflow. Also stackoverflow is extremly hysteric about keeping every comment trail, and has a very slow garbage collection. I think stackoveflow automatically deletes a answer with negative votes after a while. On the other hand ChatGPT keeps a side bar with all the interactions, and you can delete an interaction any time you want to do so. There is no maniac idea to keep interactions. Stackoverflow possibly only keeps this interactions to be able to send people to their virtual prison. Basically they have become a perverted para-governemental institution that exercises violence. Mild Shock schrieb: > Hi, > > Lets say I have to chose between pig wrestle with a > grammar nazi stackoverflow user with 100k reputation, or > to interact with ChatGPT that puts a lot of > > effort to understand the least cue I give, isn't > shot in to english only, you can also use it with > german, turkish, etc.. what ever. > > Who do I use as a programmimg companion, stackoverflow > or ChatGPT. I think ChatGPT is the clear winner, > it doesn't feature the abomination of a virtual > > prison like stackoverflow. Or as Cycorp, Inc has put > it already decades ago: > > Common Sense Reasoning – From Cyc to Intelligent Assistant > Doug Lenat et al. - August 2006 > 2 The Case for an Ambient Research Assistant > 2.3 Components of a Truly Intelligent Computational Assistant > Natural Language: > An assistant system must be able to remember > questions, statements, etc. from the user, and > what its own response was, in order to understand > the kinds of language ‘shortcuts’ people normally use > in context. > https://www.researchgate.net/publication/226813714 > > Bye > > Mild Shock schrieb: >> Thats a funny quote: >> >> "Once you have a truly massive amount of information >> integrated as knowledge, then the human-software >> system will be superhuman, in the same sense that >> mankind with writing is superhuman compared to >> mankind before writing." >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douglas_Lenat#Quotes >> >> Mild Shock schrieb: >>> Just reading: >>> >>> "Deep ecologists reject any mechanical >>> or computer model of nature, and see >>> the Earth as a living organism, which >>> should be treated and understood accordingly" >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_ecology#Sources >>> >>> Now that we enter the age of AI. What >>> about an AI Computer model. An AI Earth >>> Computer model? Any pointers? >>> >> >