Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: WM Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: Re: 2N=E Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2024 10:07:19 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 16 Message-ID: References: <3537899e-e951-4138-b56c-fc76340762b8@att.net> <8b31df46-1361-4dd1-aed3-1f42039af960@att.net> <84c1bb5d-67db-4d21-918a-f86cd1f815c5@att.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2024 10:07:19 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a64f40a529641b77af8a405524a5b42f"; logging-data="2723728"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19UD5tlvc9QIzLpPz8k3RnoxQq8p+4XTec=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:NRYVXZrjAqC2HTjenRrC7hruwVM= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 2437 On 07.11.2024 01:03, Moebius wrote: > Am 06.11.2024 um 22:00 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson: > > On 11/6/2024 7:14 AM, WM wrote: > >>> The mathe[maticians] who claim that after every natural number there >>> are almost all natural numbers > > are quite right. > > Hint: If n is a natural number, then it is "followed" by the infinitely > many natural numbers n+1, n+2, n+3, ... Almost all remain outside of the bijection with the rationals? How many rationals remain outside too? Regards, WM