Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: FromTheRafters Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: Re: How many different unit fractions are lessorequal than all unit fractions? (infinitary) Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 15:49:27 -0400 Organization: Peripheral Visions Lines: 18 Message-ID: References: <0e5fb47d-60f7-42bb-beec-4a9661c807da@tha.de> Reply-To: erratic.howard@gmail.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 20:49:33 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="11ec534abeba4677107cf4f4338cc049"; logging-data="2983148"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/uknGtDckTEP0hkd2fvUJ+iR9FP+Q3VEA=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:1BX8IEQIa3IRDCdpEdlqEq9esuw= X-ICQ: 1701145376 X-Newsreader: MesNews/1.08.06.00-gb Bytes: 2800 Chris M. Thomasson used his keyboard to write : > On 10/31/2024 9:02 AM, FromTheRafters wrote: >> WM explained : >>> On 31.10.2024 12:00, FromTheRafters wrote: >>> >>>> Failure to recognize that discontinuity is mathematical noted. >>> >>> False. NUF(x) can only increase at unit fractions. They cause no larger >>> discontinuity than 1. >> >> Wrong, your function, if swept as you seem to require, jumps from zero to >> countable infinity and stays there. Why do you call 1 a discontinuity? > > Trying to start counting unit fractions from the "other end" is moronic to > me. The first unit fraction is 1/1, so WM says, well, lets count from the > last unit fraction up to one. LOL! That right there is moronic. It makes me wonder what he will come up with next.