Path: ...!news.roellig-ltd.de!open-news-network.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.szaf.org!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.eyrie.org!jik4.kamens.us!ngp.big-8.org!robomod!not-for-mail
X-NGP-Policy: http://www.big-8.org/~ngp
X-NGP-Info-1: Send submissions to ngp@ngp.big-8.org
X-NGP-Info-2: Send technical complaints to ngp-admin@ngp.big-8.org
X-NGP-Info-3: Send complaints about policy to ngp-board@ngp.big-8.org
X-Comment: Moderators do not necessarily agree or disagree with this article.
X-Robomod: STUMP
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2024 18:28:53 CST
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 jik4.kamens.us 4AKNSB0B2036729
Authentication-Results: name/26BF15F8D5; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=9srv.net
From: Anthony
Newsgroups: news.groups.proposals
Subject: Re: Moderator Vacancy Investigation: comp.os.plan9
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID:
References:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2024 00:28:03 +0100 (CET)
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:XK2p2VsBZ1whsJxJZ5YVnrIwEgg=
sha1:aUDKpQZqgwX0R6GYb38nGG6pP3I=
X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX1/QQ39hlSqNCHvCBnxg3cWIxcluBf9NfEs=
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.8 required=5.0
tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,
RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED,
SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_WELCOMELIST,USER_IN_WHITELIST
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
smtp.eternal-september.org
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1
Approved: NGP Approval Key
X-Approval-Mod: rlucas
Lines: 23
X-Auth: PGPMoose V1.1 PGP news.groups.proposals
iH0EABECAD0WIQSH6so/GGyIEkxgFjWs+RBu6T2F2wUCZz5wtR8cbmdwLWFwcHJv
dmFsLWtleUBuZ3AuYmlnLTgub3JnAAoJEKz5EG7pPYXbwwoAmgNIyxV96nTyPXok
3WJPXtw8/QCnAKCu/5xhEvY5Ul+tC9Zz2w5AdfJCnQ==
=uY8e
Bytes: 3229
Anthony wrote:
> Tristan Miller wrote:
>> Dear Anthony,
>>
>> On 2024-11-03 15:03, Anthony wrote:
>>> Working on it. Waiting on confirmation from my current provider that
>>> they’ll allow injecting messages with the Approved header set (pending the
>>> conclusion if the MVI). Also more testing to do. But nearly there.
>>
>> Any update on this yet? If you can confirm that you've got the
>> moderation setup in place, we'd be happy to conclude the MVI. Let us
>> know if you need any help.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Tristan
>>
>
> Infrastructure now in place, including confirming that my provider will
> accept the appropriate header once the MVI is concluded.
>
In case it matters for the MVI, that’s still me. I forgot to change back
from a testing address.