Path: ...!news.roellig-ltd.de!news.mb-net.net!open-news-network.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,alt.folklore.computers Subject: Re: The joy of FORTRAN Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2024 06:13:32 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 14 Message-ID: References: <5mqdnZuGq4lgwm_7nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <36KdnVlGJu9VLW77nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@earthlink.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2024 08:13:32 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="afd4a43005508c01c783914c8e846b23"; logging-data="712865"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/VbcuCaYsU3gqsY2FdXmeg" User-Agent: Pan/0.160 (Toresk; ) Cancel-Lock: sha1:f35V/1y7yKB8vJkSehwiWv9gfOw= Bytes: 2133 On Sat, 05 Oct 2024 02:37:16 GMT, Charlie Gibbs wrote: > On 2024-10-04, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > >> Of course, all this goes out the window once you get to the GUI layer; >> that is the end of the line, with no more programmability (easily) >> possible on top of that. From that point on, the human user has to do >> all the work. > > This led to my observation that "interactive" is synonymous with > "manual". No, “graphical interaction” is synonymous with “manual”. An interactive text-based command line still allows for automation.