Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Joy of this, Joy of that
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2024 09:03:53 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <vih8po$2bov0$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vhigot$1uakf$1@dont-email.me>
	<871pz4osys.fsf@comcast.net.invalid> <vhp646$12c7u$1@dont-email.me>
	<pgidnQQYp91K_dz6nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
	<vhsdhp$1m6qu$2@dont-email.me>
	<X4KcnQQzFNko49_6nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
	<vhvdmo$2900d$3@dont-email.me> <vhvdqu$28p7r$7@dont-email.me>
	<vhvm34$2aerk$2@dont-email.me>
	<1b166410-ecc1-f9e5-7218-cde9618f4686@example.net>
	<lqi4odFdu06U3@mid.individual.net>
	<77840736-c143-e896-5da0-d0afae4915ed@example.net>
	<vi1p3r$2oh05$7@dont-email.me> <vi2rd9$318ah$5@dont-email.me>
	<8xidnV6HZos6I9v6nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@earthlink.com>
	<vi85j6$6ct6$7@dont-email.me>
	<eOqcnUPJTdkXetr6nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
	<lqqeduFo61aU3@mid.individual.net>
	<vRWdna-Hi8nZv9X6nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
	<vianoa$na9e$3@dont-email.me>
	<5cKdndZFvPPeD9T6nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@earthlink.com>
	<vidcgc$18mjb$1@dont-email.me>
	<9PucnWZylb39Pdf6nZ2dnZfqn_QAAAAA@earthlink.com>
	<vieavl$1idmm$1@dont-email.me>
	<hZednefWNZ5HvdH6nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@earthlink.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2024 10:03:53 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="344d860f97bf5f393cb5083eafd98166";
	logging-data="2483168"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+tyVGzMt5S0spM/jHaNzMt"
User-Agent: Pan/0.161 (Chasiv Yar; )
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Mvoj0n4bVim9JfYNB1ioFGecxrM=
Bytes: 2907

On Sun, 1 Dec 2024 03:39:53 -0500, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:

> On 11/30/24 1:22 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 30 Nov 2024 00:19:28 -0500, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:
>> 
>>> On 11/29/24 4:42 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 29 Nov 2024 05:06:58 -0500, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> [Python] isn't REALLY meant for interactive web apps.
>>>>
>>>> There are quite a few frameworks for using Python to do exactly that.
>>>
>>> Yea, sort of, but they seem kinda clunky work-arounds to me.
>> 
>> Really? Which ones would you describe that way? Work-arounds for what?
> 
> Server-side, PHP is about all that's properly supported.

Which is not answering the question.

> As such, you really won't find any straight-up Python based
> server-side web interpreters.

The usual Python implementation works just fine.

> What exists are ALL sort of kludges, some evoking PHP to get things
> done.

Never encountered any such thing. Can you give examples of such “kludges”?