Path: ...!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: rbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: The joy of Zeppelins
Date: 5 Nov 2024 00:55:15 GMT
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <lot8njFmpheU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <pan$96411$d204da43$cc34bb91$1fe98651@linux.rocks>
	<vfltbc$7ek$1@gal.iecc.com> <ASCTO.586560$1m96.217020@fx15.iad>
	<vfpc6g$a0p$1@gal.iecc.com> <B17UO.740251$_o_3.409662@fx17.iad>
	<GV9UO.301902$kxD8.146393@fx11.iad> <loct65F6l90U2@mid.individual.net>
	<199392d0-9628-8177-2f3b-35b23a721dd4@example.net>
	<lodc4vF8rrjU1@mid.individual.net>
	<ddb44c1a-b458-5cce-b4d1-6258677f5621@example.net>
	<vft5ai$24n5h$1@dont-email.me>
	<086607f1-2283-f7fb-ddf9-ac4766b06530@example.net>
	<wfqdnZAVqbJdm776nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
	<vfvjgt$2khfc$6@dont-email.me> <3RPUO.364883$v8v2.299927@fx18.iad>
	<vg0i0v$2pk7j$3@dont-email.me> <6723f0c1@news.ausics.net>
	<d108e300-2756-4f88-941a-a70090b2a9ce@example.net>
	<lokjl3Fd136U1@mid.individual.net>
	<7bd05232-fb70-d3c8-d89a-be9f63d85207@example.net>
	<lolc4lFgiklU1@mid.individual.net>
	<483e3c29-b695-d91a-bab1-68264d17296f@example.net>
	<117525921.752442206.774429.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org>
	<vgbfuv$14q8q$3@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net ZzkMhMlsseTvAQLIWNZZ5wE7yYKK7H+fhg+HvIhb+aA08V6TEh
Cancel-Lock: sha1:99bmdjpfO/LiY0IceFHCqgiRsX0= sha256:dwBM2dX9rxR0ipT66PTE1LeMH2tCkr/FLAqUbtvJ8lQ=
User-Agent: Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba)
Bytes: 2042

On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 21:56:47 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:

> I think the full rigids are considered too fragile for safety. This in
> spite of the fact that ex-Navy man Hugo Eckener had a 100% safety record
> in piloting hydrogen-filled craft.

Ex-Navy? He did good work. LZ 126 was the only Zepplin to survive the US 
Navy long enough to become a hangar queen.