Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail
From: ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc
Subject: Re: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages
Date: 14 Oct 2024 15:19:03 GMT
Organization: Stefan Ram
Lines: 22
Expires: 1 Jul 2025 11:59:58 GMT
Message-ID: <language-20241014161532@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
References: <uu54la$3su5b$6@dont-email.me> <vegqu5$o3ve$1@dont-email.me> <veh9ph$fl2$1@reader1.panix.com> <veiki1$14g6h$1@dont-email.me> <vej6rs$1d4$1@reader1.panix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de dHpE3ioEu9gkaz8Uo1zzMAAOUz4Huxj/9/pdOPymSs7COt
Cancel-Lock: sha1:t/J1xEJ1oi7pMygEfLBwKzXvmJ4= sha256:41WwrEuYhPxP0Wy7bmBBxOOuwU4cJP4nbt72gnHG5ag=
X-Copyright: (C) Copyright 2024 Stefan Ram. All rights reserved.
	Distribution through any means other than regular usenet
	channels is forbidden. It is forbidden to publish this
	article in the Web, to change URIs of this article into links,
        and to transfer the body without this notice, but quotations
        of parts in other Usenet posts are allowed.
X-No-Archive: Yes
Archive: no
X-No-Archive-Readme: "X-No-Archive" is set, because this prevents some
	services to mirror the article in the web. But the article may
	be kept on a Usenet archive server with only NNTP access.
X-No-Html: yes
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2103

cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) wrote or quoted:
>Your claim that "machine language" is not a "language" is simply
>not true.

  Machine language is a language.

  (It might not be a /formal/ language when the specification
  is not definite. For example, when one says, "6502", are the
  "undocumented" opcodes a part of this language or not? So, for
  a formal language, you have to make sure that it's definite.)

  Not related to unix. So, not,

Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell,comp.unix.programmer,comp.lang.misc

  , but,

Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc

  .