Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news.in-chemnitz.de!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: rbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Two points
Date: 2 Dec 2024 06:14:21 GMT
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <lr51htFfehkU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <lqu2q4Fa9h6U1@mid.individual.net> <vidd61$18mjb$5@dont-email.me>
	<viidfc$2ntnt$1@dont-email.me> <viivs8$2t3h9$2@dont-email.me>
	<vij74v$2trqh$1@dont-email.me> <vijhg6$34qql$3@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net RDegaJTcXsYkXVO8fR/RUg+GrmmDl38OFGh8YkAEeSHKvbd0+H
Cancel-Lock: sha1:J+Vynp+bf91Wdwrk0WKYVlXIfQo= sha256:rrM1FcKVeIJOnshm0KnvU5wm98tHBoZPOHRcUXCm+pg=
User-Agent: Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba)
Bytes: 1277

On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 05:44:38 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:

> I’m sure the market likes them a lot, but the market cannot change the
> laws of physics either: I can always do more with the resources of a
> desktop than I can with an equivalently-specced laptop, if I don’t need
> the mobility of the latter.

Doesn't 'equivalently-specced' imply the same 'resources'?