Path: ...!news.roellig-ltd.de!open-news-network.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: VanguardLH Newsgroups: comp.mobile.android Subject: Re: Why do people use the Google Play Store search engine? Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2024 09:11:01 -0600 Organization: Usenet Elder Lines: 18 Sender: V@nguard.LH Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net IXQBnfEBZallN8QK8IKvugQblmptfPLj3V+a1I7I8FqD8v8w/t Keywords: VanguardLH,VLH Cancel-Lock: sha1:JdY85XiRj5pJtJPJ/qQec9ff7g8= sha256:rNs8cUYaIggiCBSPQPyURTWQLWq34/uFdVzuDWAuR/g= User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.41 Bytes: 1862 Andrew wrote: > VanguardLH wrote on Wed, 4 Dec 2024 13:41:55 -0600 : > >> However, you said OSMand, not OSMand+. Yet Fdroid you claim offers the >> free (non-plus) version is instead proliferating the plus paid version >> that you tout as free. In a search on "osmand" at Fdroid, the only >> match in their search was: >> >> https://f-droid.org/en/packages/net.osmand.plus/ >> >> That looks to be the OSMand+ version, but they substituted ~ for + in >> the product name yet "plus" is in the URL path. > > Why are you repeating this? Everyone knows this. It's been discussed > something like a thousand times on this newsgroup Vanguard. Provide 100 MIDs for those claimed "thousands" of prior discussions.