Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: WM Newsgroups: sci.logic Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 12:24:24 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 15 Message-ID: References: <539edbdf516d69a3f1207687b802be7a86bd3b48@i2pn2.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 12:24:25 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="459270fc4ffaa1dd70d5397fb39cf68a"; logging-data="2396754"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18dn1/lX3XnCKpyoXicyldhPwkxKyAd0Jo=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:gn3B4U81QzFnyqVFRHNoyXNVT/s= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 1891 On 18.12.2024 11:23, Mikko wrote: > On 2024-12-17 19:32:51 +0000, WM said: >>> But your "cursor" >>> and its movment and therfore my "before" can be converted to >>> mathematical >>> presentation >> >> It is an object of applied mathematics. > > Matter of opinion, and so is whether applied mathematics is mahtematics. > Anyhow my argument is correct. Regards, WM