Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Bobbie Sellers Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written Subject: Re: AGW. LNG Worse Than Coal. Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 17:50:52 -0700 Organization: nil Lines: 20 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: blissInSanFrancisco@mouse-potato.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 01:50:52 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="71f8f536e3eaab8b3c3b8aca354fc4d8"; logging-data="1883790"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+/QI651Qhc8XWb6H8OYE06" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:VykKZ4QkWUdC6cOULlBjjjxXjNQ= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Bytes: 1991 On 10/29/24 17:41, Someone claiming to be Titus G wrote: > Recent headlines report on research confirming that LNG has a far > greater negative impact on climate change than coal. I have been waiting > for D or Dimwire to raise this topic but not holding my breath. Back in > 2014 the US was offering IMF and World Bank funding to Ukraine to > develop its natural gas industry to gain independence from Russia > despite a required doubling in the Ukranian price of gas and the Biden > crime family was profiting from that was part of that A side benefit > of the US proxy war with Russia has been a significant increase in gas > exports for the US so neither Trump nor Harris are likely to consider > this problem if they obtain the power to do so. Almost fracking > unbelievable! More Putin BS propaganda. LNG is about 50% better for the environment than coal or 100% better than the way Russian Troops have treated Nuclear Reactor power plants. bliss