Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!reader5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Mild Shock Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: Highly bred Hackers: Wallowing in enlightenment (Re: Deep Ecology and Artificial Intelligence) Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2024 17:48:44 +0200 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2024 15:48:43 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: solani.org; logging-data="1516346"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@news.solani.org" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.19 Cancel-Lock: sha1:uYRgwFAfAomeSgaKxaR9kGdwJXk= In-Reply-To: X-User-ID: eJwFwYEBACAEBMCVJC+NE8/+I3SH7cvrmMMNg8kqrduytUS9Fnf6pFFDLAhGmPEdhjzRc3N8Ca3RILJHP1+tFeY= Bytes: 2235 Lines: 40 Hey folks, please take note: "Rust is the last programming language made for humans that we'll need. Future languages will be optimized for machines, where AI handles all the coding" https://twitter.com/nath_simard/status/1816147809608851830 Sounds like utter bullshit to me. Must be a stupid AI, that cannot do the safety precautions of Rust. Why would I need rust, if I have an AI? For this exampe, the AI might generate: #include int main(int argc, char* argv[]) { printf("Hello %s\n", argv[0]); } Which might indeed generate a segfault. In case there are zero arguments, argv[0] might hafe the value NULL. https://www.tu-chemnitz.de/urz/archiv/kursunterlagen/C/kap3/argmain.htm So why blame the target language, and not the AI? This is a red herring argument in favor of Rust. Mild Shock schrieb: > Just reading: > > "Deep ecologists reject any mechanical > or computer model of nature, and see > the Earth as a living organism, which > should be treated and understood accordingly" > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_ecology#Sources > > Now that we enter the age of AI. What > about an AI Computer model. An AI Earth > Computer model? Any pointers? >