Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.mobile.android,misc.phone.mobile.iphone
Subject: Re: RCS is not more private and secure than texting according to the FBI
Date: 18 Dec 2024 10:35:28 GMT
Organization: NOYB
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <vjuc1m.k7g.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net>
References: <vjr55k$1cnf1$1@solani.org> <p8d83lxd5u.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <vjs73v$1053j$1@solani.org> <bb493lx0lp.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <vjso49$1dnbl$1@solani.org> <6s793lxc7i.ln2@Telcontar.valinor>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net OAi8Sqaow4JOuazVumEB0w3y50r20eFhhawAz+79xnFZIrVwen
X-Orig-Path: not-for-mail
Cancel-Lock: sha1:RrRkCf+Qb9CmtkY2jaj0HDQQhCw= sha256:6j+c+8kVv+ghSFef55WUMs/5mxFpqe7r2szW+22kTG0=
User-Agent: tin/1.6.2-20030910 ("Pabbay") (UNIX) (CYGWIN_NT-10.0-WOW/2.8.0(0.309/5/3) (i686)) Hamster/2.0.2.2
Bytes: 1970

Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
> On 2024-12-17 21:49, Jörg Lorenz wrote:
> > On 17.12.24 21:42, Carlos E.R. wrote:
> >> On 2024-12-17 16:58, Jörg Lorenz wrote:
> >>> On 17.12.24 15:08, Carlos E.R. wrote:
> >>>> On 2024-12-17 07:19, Jörg Lorenz wrote:
> >>>>> Avoid to use RCS!
> >>>>
> >>>> If an iPhone is involved. It's fine on Android. The article you posted
> >>>> says so.
> >>>
> >>> You do not understand what happens.
> >>> RCS is Google's wet dream. Nobody needs it or wants it.
> >>>
> >>
> >> We know you say that, and we also know this to be false. Don't worry
> >> about it :-)
> > 
> > You comment is redundant. In this particular case the FBI is a lot more
> > trustworthy than you will ever be.
> > 
> 
> The FBI doesn't contradict me at all.

  Of course they don't. After all, you didn't give them permission to
disagree with you, did you!?