Path: ...!news.roellig-ltd.de!open-news-network.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Ralf Damaschke <rwspam@gmx.de>
Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell
Subject: Re: a sed question
Date: 21 Dec 2024 00:17:09 GMT
Organization: C.H.A.O.S.
Lines: 6
Message-ID: <lsmfo5Ffor3U1@mid.individual.net>
References: <874j304vv3.fsf@example.com> <lshab3Fk6t3U1@mid.individual.net>
	<87wmfv27yy.fsf@example.com> <lsjtj8F2r8aU1@mid.individual.net>
	<vk3orv$1ut71$1@news.xmission.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net U/ypeeDGPoT2BMb+sD/gOgnHiwWs2NdBBIYhhdmKixs7Di1PKw
Cancel-Lock: sha1:pAwmyAj8k3xLtxbrbyJ6iFYMfGM= sha256:vwTf7N+fTRUe/rYH6M2HL4n//nrsSnYJG9oDsQathp4=
User-Agent: Pan/0.155 (Kherson; fc5a80b8)
Bytes: 1102

Kenny McCormack schrieb:

> Isn't this about the time where we give the caution about "Don't use sed
> for anything beyond the s/foo/bar/g stage" ?

Simply because you cannot imagine how to use it? No!