Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: moviePig Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: ABC settles "rape" claim re: Pres. Elect. Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2024 13:01:18 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 122 Message-ID: References: <4ubgmjdmd8rdfictqu5il3pg60ns81746b@4ax.com> <4klimjdulc9vbb00lkgjmdkqdml2ahork9@4ax.com> <8qsqmjlikhmjfivakeo7csm9qvnts2ausu@4ax.com> <0cmtmjpqqm98ohk459r9dss91ndh0ue3c6@4ax.com> Reply-To: nobody@nowhere.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2024 19:01:21 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e1825acdde40ddaabb1c085eaf8ae61a"; logging-data="3941452"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18YPSRj/2/83rnbDqDHubjOWRGSk+AFBkU=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:t9DX+Xp+7hrpYjKPhiIApvc9/gA= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <0cmtmjpqqm98ohk459r9dss91ndh0ue3c6@4ax.com> Bytes: 6680 On 12/27/2024 11:46 AM, NoBody wrote: > On Thu, 26 Dec 2024 12:06:05 -0500, moviePig > wrote: > >> On 12/26/2024 10:17 AM, NoBody wrote: >>> On Wed, 25 Dec 2024 12:31:38 -0500, moviePig >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 12/25/2024 11:26 AM, NoBody wrote: >>>>> On Tue, 24 Dec 2024 15:51:18 -0500, moviePig >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 12/24/2024 7:37 AM, NoBody wrote: >>>>>>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 11:48:57 -0500, moviePig >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 12/23/2024 7:25 AM, NoBody wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Sun, 22 Dec 2024 13:23:29 -0500, moviePig >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 12/22/2024 10:27 AM, NoBody wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 21 Dec 2024 11:43:29 -0500, moviePig >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/21/2024 10:19 AM, NoBody wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 13:12:54 -0500, moviePig >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/20/2024 7:04 AM, NoBody wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 14:42:58 -0500, shawn >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 12:53:45 -0500, EGK wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 07:31:32 -0500, NoBody wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 01:31:39 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suzeeq wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/18/2024 4:28 AM, NoBody wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 11:57:19 -0500, moviePig wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> . . . >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your President-elect forcibly finger fucked her. Explain *that* fact. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump was not convicted of rape. ABC said he was. They lied. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> End of story. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In other jurisdictions it's considered rape/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But he wasn't in other jurisdictions. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The harm to Donald Trump wws nominal. not $15 million worth. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ABC obviously felt otherwise given that they caved so quickly. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They didnt want to go through discovery and be exposed as the biased >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> organization most of the media is. ABC producers warned Stephanopolous not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to use the term "rape" and he just thumbed his nose at them and did it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repeatedly anyway. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://nypost.com/2024/12/18/media/abc-parent-disney-didnt-think-it-would-beat-trump-in-court-report/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He could still likely have gotten away with it if he had said >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something like "I think he's guilty of rape" while still giving the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> official legal facts. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let's not forget he was verbally attacking a rape victim during the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interview. Way to go Boy George. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, he was verbally (albeit indirectly) attacking a rapist. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Did you see the interview? He was extremely aggressive towards her. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Disgraceful behavior. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I agree. He was extremely aggressive towards her disgraceful behavior. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> What disgraceful bbehavior did she exhibit? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> She stonewalled his question by chanting a baseless accusation. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> What "baseless accusation"? >>>>>>>>> You have this completely backwards. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Well, "backwards" is certainly what she was going for. She tried to >>>>>>>> turn his question ("How can a rapee support a rapist?") into shaming >>>>>>>> raped women for their "political choices". I can't even begin... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Look at you blaming the (literal) victim. >>>>>>> You're pathetic. >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes, you parrot her faithfully. >>>>>> >>>>> Your evasion is noted and is your admission that you've lost the >>>>> discussion. >>>> >>>> If I had nickel for every self-declared "victor"... >>>> >>> >>> You make a claim and are completely unable to either defend it or have >>> a reasonable explanation for your position. This is the very >>> definition of "loss". You did it to yourself. >>> >>> Deal with it. >> >> Okay... what did I blame on a "literal victim"? What did George? Think >> carefully, now... >> > > Perhaps you need to review the video of the interview before > commenting further. Agressively interviewing a rape victim using a > false claim as the basis of the discussion is "blaming the victim". No, it isn't. Hint: notice how you can't answer either question.