Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: NoBody Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: ABC settles "rape" claim re: Pres. Elect. Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2024 11:46:21 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 119 Message-ID: <0cmtmjpqqm98ohk459r9dss91ndh0ue3c6@4ax.com> References: <4ubgmjdmd8rdfictqu5il3pg60ns81746b@4ax.com> <4klimjdulc9vbb00lkgjmdkqdml2ahork9@4ax.com> <8qsqmjlikhmjfivakeo7csm9qvnts2ausu@4ax.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2024 17:46:22 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="375ba694da3d1ce9672b7a0c1f52ebc7"; logging-data="3905410"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/uDuZPNFtsDUNYxnGatJwhDdmmGTAlaCc=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:eNOaBasnZeLcpN1+isdV9kxNrsk= X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 241227-2, 12/27/2024), Outbound message X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 3.3/32.846 Bytes: 6402 On Thu, 26 Dec 2024 12:06:05 -0500, moviePig wrote: >On 12/26/2024 10:17 AM, NoBody wrote: >> On Wed, 25 Dec 2024 12:31:38 -0500, moviePig >> wrote: >> >>> On 12/25/2024 11:26 AM, NoBody wrote: >>>> On Tue, 24 Dec 2024 15:51:18 -0500, moviePig >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 12/24/2024 7:37 AM, NoBody wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 11:48:57 -0500, moviePig >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 12/23/2024 7:25 AM, NoBody wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sun, 22 Dec 2024 13:23:29 -0500, moviePig >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 12/22/2024 10:27 AM, NoBody wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 21 Dec 2024 11:43:29 -0500, moviePig >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 12/21/2024 10:19 AM, NoBody wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 13:12:54 -0500, moviePig >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/20/2024 7:04 AM, NoBody wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 14:42:58 -0500, shawn >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 12:53:45 -0500, EGK wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 07:31:32 -0500, NoBody wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 01:31:39 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suzeeq wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/18/2024 4:28 AM, NoBody wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 11:57:19 -0500, moviePig wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> . . . >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your President-elect forcibly finger fucked her. Explain *that* fact. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump was not convicted of rape. ABC said he was. They lied. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> End of story. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In other jurisdictions it's considered rape/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But he wasn't in other jurisdictions. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The harm to Donald Trump wws nominal. not $15 million worth. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ABC obviously felt otherwise given that they caved so quickly. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They didnt want to go through discovery and be exposed as the biased >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> organization most of the media is. ABC producers warned Stephanopolous not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to use the term "rape" and he just thumbed his nose at them and did it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repeatedly anyway. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://nypost.com/2024/12/18/media/abc-parent-disney-didnt-think-it-would-beat-trump-in-court-report/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He could still likely have gotten away with it if he had said >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something like "I think he's guilty of rape" while still giving the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> official legal facts. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let's not forget he was verbally attacking a rape victim during the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> interview. Way to go Boy George. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> No, he was verbally (albeit indirectly) attacking a rapist. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Did you see the interview? He was extremely aggressive towards her. >>>>>>>>>>>> Disgraceful behavior. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I agree. He was extremely aggressive towards her disgraceful behavior. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> What disgraceful bbehavior did she exhibit? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> She stonewalled his question by chanting a baseless accusation. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What "baseless accusation"? >>>>>>>> You have this completely backwards. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Well, "backwards" is certainly what she was going for. She tried to >>>>>>> turn his question ("How can a rapee support a rapist?") into shaming >>>>>>> raped women for their "political choices". I can't even begin... >>>>>>> >>>>>> Look at you blaming the (literal) victim. >>>>>> You're pathetic. >>>>> >>>>> Yes, you parrot her faithfully. >>>>> >>>> Your evasion is noted and is your admission that you've lost the >>>> discussion. >>> >>> If I had nickel for every self-declared "victor"... >>> >> >> You make a claim and are completely unable to either defend it or have >> a reasonable explanation for your position. This is the very >> definition of "loss". You did it to yourself. >> >> Deal with it. > >Okay... what did I blame on a "literal victim"? What did George? Think >carefully, now... > Perhaps you need to review the video of the interview before commenting further. Agressively interviewing a rape victim using a false claim as the basis of the discussion is "blaming the victim". Think carefully, now...