Path: ...!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Rainer Weikusat Newsgroups: comp.unix.programmer Subject: Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2024 20:16:08 +0000 Lines: 17 Message-ID: <87frmqja0n.fsf@doppelsaurus.mobileactivedefense.com> References: <20241213074207.00004176@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net cmn90+xgJQP86zM5l7IVqAsz6/Bc1MHqP6vEp9qicThdEX7Yk= Cancel-Lock: sha1:Xl1+7S6RBDwzmO1uoEVsO+5UHs8= sha1:JUA003gSlEELXx+1YBgdpcnWDf4= sha256:gWaTLiaIoA0v/JPFi3o7CUiZBtRCUrbY80sVBMi3Tqw= User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) Bytes: 2293 Lawrence D'Oliveiro writes: > On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 07:42:07 -0800, John Ames wrote: >> This bears repeating. Why *anybody* decided to trust the judgement of >> the person who gave us the jankiest of all the incredibly janky *nix >> audio subsystems is beyond comprehension. > > There was no reason why you had to. You could easily have created your own > distro without any of his code in it, if you wanted to. Or become an > aficionado of one of the existing distros that did exactly that. > > Open Source is all about choice. If you can’t stand the thought of people > making different choices from you, you know what you can do. If these people get paid by $big_name_companies, there's exactly nothing individuals can do about that. Unless they happen to be rich enough that they can waste a ton of money on their hobbies and then, they'd still need to get a competent work force from somewhere.