Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Mikko Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Relativity Refuted by Elementary Logic Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2024 10:14:31 +0200 Organization: - Lines: 23 Message-ID: References: <27cf5f58333a92a17fb129caf2cafdd7@www.novabbs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2024 09:14:31 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="9a2a304718252777197f6e54aa5a827a"; logging-data="231723"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+fr9IQe5wYFktKFX4BDdGc" User-Agent: Unison/2.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:R3L6xErCZ6/AxPZuY/nfF43W6K0= Bytes: 1510 On 2024-10-27 03:06:16 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen said: > Relativity Refuted by Elementary Logic Relativity is perfectly compatible with elementary and advanced logic, > 1. Time dilation: Since time is an abstraction, That does not prevent us from talking about it. > this necessarily involves the reification fallacy, making it illogical > nonsense. No, it does not. The expression "time dilation" has its own meaning that does not follow from the meanings of "time" and "dilation". > Time does not dilate. That does not follow from logic or anything mentioned above. -- Mikko