Path: ...!news.nobody.at!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!reader5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Jan Panteltje Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: Be very, very afraid... Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2024 09:34:20 GMT Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2024 09:34:21 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: solani.org; logging-data="1551749"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@news.solani.org" User-Agent: NewsFleX-1.5.7.5 (Linux-5.15.32-v7l+) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Pzn/y2NUnz1+2/5VfHca72vpipA= X-Newsreader-location: NewsFleX-1.5.7.5 (c) 'LIGHTSPEED' off line news reader for the Linux platform NewsFleX homepage: http://www.panteltje.nl/panteltje/newsflex/ and ftp download ftp://sunsite.unc.edu/pub/linux/system/news/readers/ X-User-ID: eJwFwYEBwDAEBMCVwiOMwzf2H6F3jpDgtfAwX19EZ4y58gkJe3zaqNOKsQ9C/VozB7NZqjbcV5RzDLeK/gNbfxWB Bytes: 2839 Lines: 40 On a sunny day (Sun, 27 Oct 2024 08:34:49 -0000 (UTC)) it happened Cursitor Doom wrote in : >On Sun, 27 Oct 2024 05:53:10 GMT, Jan Panteltje wrote: > >> On a sunny day (Sat, 26 Oct 2024 17:43:26 -0700) it happened Don Y >> wrote in : >> >>>No, not that AI is going to take your job ("render you redundant") but, >>>rather, that it is going to be relied upon for information that is >>>provably incorrect: >>> >>>business-90020cdf5fa16c79ca2e5b6c4c9bbb14> >>> >>>it seems the most expeditious way to get these sorts of problems fixed >>>is NOT to regulate how it can be used but, rather, to hold firms using >>>it financially (criminally?) accountable for its follies... >> >> Sure, like doctors tha'st make mistakes: >> https://qualitysafety.bmj.com/content/33/2/109 >> >> Does them using AI reduce errors? >> If so they could be accountable for not using it... >> Like a second opinion, always required? >> >> It is complicated.. >> hacked;-) >> Power outage... >> etc etc > >Anyone concerned about medical confidentiality should *never* consent to >having their records held in digital form anyway. Databases holding such >info are prime targets for cyberattacks, as the UK's NHS is quickly >finding out. My medical records are held in digital form and when I moved house I had to give consent for the records to be made availabe to the local doctor here. But those digital records only go back a few years.. to when they started with it. Not much in there.