Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: legg Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: squeezing a field Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2024 11:20:42 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 14 Message-ID: <312qhj9di9ged5q7n3tksefhtup64e6avl@4ax.com> References: <1r1ycdl.17sbr9wqmmq68N%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2024 17:18:29 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="581a3962416d163d9e9de1dd39066176"; logging-data="3972110"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+LrShL93Mg0snqLdsijJIm" Cancel-Lock: sha1:MGXFHskO4CCuZGruICPkTNkDtQ0= X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118 Bytes: 1699 On Fri, 25 Oct 2024 16:08:08 +1100, Bill Sloman wrote: >He was remarkably good, just not totally perfect. > >His footnote reference to "squegging" in the 1959 class-D oscillator >paper is another minor drop-off. He can't be blamed for it, but a >super-hero might have done better. What's wrong with 'squegging' ? It's a simple word that covers a host of faults that all give the same approximate symptom . . RL