Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: What composes the mass of an =?UTF-8?B?ZWxlY3Ryb24/?= Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 15:04:01 +0000 Organization: novaBBS Message-ID: <66b062fdd9b053fba2cea2a34657a3e7@www.novabbs.com> References: <18065991e0039a1e$16$1022089$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <18068e8550a65c77$381565$977218$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <55b20121efaeac53aa58574fc4ab6e2e@www.novabbs.com> <1806b7206a3339cc$381734$977218$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <1806f020dbebefc6$7671$1022089$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <3c8b74e795cee7f20722ec0dfcaceeec@www.novabbs.com> <1806fd03c363f010$9350$1022089$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <161fdadf0ab8c47e4b88f64d42c4de36@www.novabbs.com> <18075c3b4cc00fd9$410843$977218$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <1b68784108ae0b9c384e6a60d606ad9a@www.novabbs.com> <1807a8303a366662$50789$1014679$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="2593126"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="TRF929uvrTGZYJLF+N3tVBXNVfr/PeoSjsJ9hd5hWzo"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$eMp/KOXTHrMuOqE7Avcl/uzRTevBd1rsxS8xt3/BvMS5sGDNQ6y4a X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 X-Rslight-Posting-User: cefb4c33981645a229d345bae7bb8942e6b32c35 Bytes: 3081 Lines: 38 On Wed, 13 Nov 2024 22:38:27 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote: > > W dniu 13.11.2024 o 16:29, gharnagel pisze: > > > > Anyway, [Wozniak's inconsistent assertion] > > is easily refuted.  Place a clock > > on earth that can be read by the moving > > observer.  It will read 86400 seconds/day, > > in complete accordance with the definition. > > That the observer's clock will read 99766 > > seconds is in accord with relativity as > > That he allegedly will - is inconsistent with > the definition Wozniak doesn't realize that "definitions" are human constructs, subject to correction when found inconsistent with reality. This has happened many many times, and Wozniak deletes an example of this which disproves his whole assertion: "The shepherd drives the wolf from the sheep's throat, for which the sheep thanks the shepherd as his liberator, while the wolf denounces him for the same act as the destroyer of liberty. Plainly, the sheep and the wolf are not agreed upon a definition of liberty." -- Abraham Lincoln > valid in your moronic church when your idiot guru > was living and mumbling. Wozniak screams "Slander!" when his foibles are pointed out yet he thinks nothing of his own profane defilement of honest humans. > QED. I don't believe Wozniak has even read Quantum ElectroDynamics.