Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!tncsrv06.tnetconsulting.net!tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net!.POSTED.omega.home.tnetconsulting.net!not-for-mail From: Grant Taylor Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell Subject: Re: De Morgan's laws Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2024 16:32:21 -0600 Organization: TNet Consulting Message-ID: References: <86y0zzlnho.fsf@example.com> <864j2kx471.fsf@example.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2024 22:32:21 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net; posting-host="omega.home.tnetconsulting.net:198.18.1.11"; logging-data="10648"; mail-complaints-to="newsmaster@tnetconsulting.net" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Bytes: 1636 Lines: 12 On 12/31/24 09:54, Lew Pitcher wrote: > I propose that the verb "DeMorgan" (as in "to DeMorgan an expression") > be used to represent the application of the normal form of "De > Morgan's theorem", and the verb "deDeMorgan" be used to represent > the application of the inverse of "DeMorgan". I would suggest "un-DeMorgan" (hyphen optional) in order to avoid conflict between the two pairs of "de" (case insensitive). -- Grant. . . .