Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Moebius <invalid@example.invalid>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers
 (extra-ordinary, effectively)
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2025 02:52:58 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 47
Message-ID: <vl7ftq$3jcou$2@dont-email.me>
References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me> <vk8tbq$j9h1$1@dont-email.me>
 <bd7dfdc7-6471-4fe6-b078-0ca739031580@att.net> <vklumc$3htmt$1@dont-email.me>
 <c03cf79d-0572-4b19-ad92-a0d12df53db9@att.net>
 <n9CdnR02SsevtPL6nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <45a632ed-26cc-4730-a8dd-1e504d6df549@att.net> <vkpa98$dofu$2@dont-email.me>
 <3d2fe306aa299bc78e94c14dadd21645d8db9829@i2pn2.org>
 <vkr8sq$t59a$2@dont-email.me>
 <d4669f26483b01c8a43dfd3ac4b61ab4a42bf551@i2pn2.org>
 <vksikk$17fjt$1@dont-email.me>
 <aa2941e93e806f1dda55d563dd062db67eb879f1@i2pn2.org>
 <vktmi3$1ia1u$1@dont-email.me>
 <c46775b30460bc564b3fe7bd1b838713829024f8@i2pn2.org>
 <vkv3t1$1qb93$1@dont-email.me>
 <2163aa0c0efba66c813e8ebda5ef5ece6d19ea34@i2pn2.org>
 <vl1bp4$2bcos$2@dont-email.me>
 <ac6061d7f9963a83c7a67f474fe9cb835c98cf5b@i2pn2.org>
 <vl5tvs$39tus$1@dont-email.me>
 <9387e323873e24f0a57b8daa49579d9a1c517563@i2pn2.org>
 <vl6i2u$3ecap$2@dont-email.me>
 <89598d353b5737d5cbfabd1cde31c797a212e13d@i2pn2.org>
 <vl7f50$3jdl8$2@dont-email.me>
Reply-To: invalid@example.invalid
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2025 02:52:59 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="535be9b8eb05cd11d8f10d2e1bb90f8d";
	logging-data="3781406"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+wQ8K7ct2+FVFSocaAf6Km"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:R4rdMwZkyX/2BqdyiujFrtbKkHA=
Content-Language: de-DE
In-Reply-To: <vl7f50$3jdl8$2@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 3123

Am 03.01.2025 um 02:39 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:
> On 1/2/2025 11:47 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>> On 1/2/25 12:23 PM, WM wrote:
>>> On 02.01.2025 14:25, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>> On 1/2/25 6:40 AM, WM wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Every union of FISONs including them all which stay below a certain 
>>>>> threshold stays below that threshold.

Nope. For each and every FISON F: F c IN.

But UNION(Set_of_FISONs) = IN.

>>>>> What can't you understand?

Your psychosis. Please see a psychatrist, Mückenheim, soon!

>>>> No, because "all which stay below a certain threshold" is not EVERY 
>>>> FISON.

Nonsense.

Hint: For each and every FISON F: F c IN.

On the other hand:

>>>> When you actually take the union of ALL [...] FISONs, 
>>>> you will get the full infinite set of IN.

Right.

>>> Stupid belief.

No, provable FACT, Mückenheim. Du dummer Spinner.

>> Sorry, your brain is dead.

Indeed. (->Please see a psychatrist, Mückenheim, soon!)

> I think so. Well, shit happens! ;^o

Indeed.

..
..
..