Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers
 (extra-ordinary, effectively)
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2025 18:23:41 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <vl6i2u$3ecap$2@dont-email.me>
References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me> <vk7dmb$7mh2$2@dont-email.me>
 <b72490c1-e61a-4c23-a3a5-f624b2c084e4@att.net> <vk8tbq$j9h1$1@dont-email.me>
 <bd7dfdc7-6471-4fe6-b078-0ca739031580@att.net> <vklumc$3htmt$1@dont-email.me>
 <c03cf79d-0572-4b19-ad92-a0d12df53db9@att.net>
 <n9CdnR02SsevtPL6nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <45a632ed-26cc-4730-a8dd-1e504d6df549@att.net> <vkpa98$dofu$2@dont-email.me>
 <3d2fe306aa299bc78e94c14dadd21645d8db9829@i2pn2.org>
 <vkr8sq$t59a$2@dont-email.me>
 <d4669f26483b01c8a43dfd3ac4b61ab4a42bf551@i2pn2.org>
 <vksikk$17fjt$1@dont-email.me>
 <aa2941e93e806f1dda55d563dd062db67eb879f1@i2pn2.org>
 <vktmi3$1ia1u$1@dont-email.me>
 <c46775b30460bc564b3fe7bd1b838713829024f8@i2pn2.org>
 <vkv3t1$1qb93$1@dont-email.me>
 <2163aa0c0efba66c813e8ebda5ef5ece6d19ea34@i2pn2.org>
 <vl1bp4$2bcos$2@dont-email.me>
 <ac6061d7f9963a83c7a67f474fe9cb835c98cf5b@i2pn2.org>
 <vl5tvs$39tus$1@dont-email.me>
 <9387e323873e24f0a57b8daa49579d9a1c517563@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2025 18:23:42 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a3e4916d82901f495981bca5b3dfcc34";
	logging-data="3617113"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18fXCxn6RF/c3riy14DJuiMMvaLqmfnOe0="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ChwjARoDGJFIZzKhwk9KQN4MdOA=
In-Reply-To: <9387e323873e24f0a57b8daa49579d9a1c517563@i2pn2.org>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2669

On 02.01.2025 14:25, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 1/2/25 6:40 AM, WM wrote:

>> Every union of FISONs including them all which stay below a certain 
>> threshold stays below that threshold. Every FISON stays below 1 % of ℕ.
>> What can't you understand?

> No, becuase "all which stay below a certain threshol" is not EVERY FISON.

Which one is more than 1 % of ℵ₀?

> When you actually take the union of ALL that infinite set of FISONs, you 
> will get the full infinite set of N.

Stupid belief. Which FISON is more than 1 % of ℵ₀?

Regards, WM