Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers
 (extra-ordinary, effectively)
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2025 14:47:41 -0500
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <2aefc2df43f7a5dfe9f7ba194adbc87ff9f586c1@i2pn2.org>
References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me> <vk7dmb$7mh2$2@dont-email.me>
 <b72490c1-e61a-4c23-a3a5-f624b2c084e4@att.net> <vk8tbq$j9h1$1@dont-email.me>
 <bd7dfdc7-6471-4fe6-b078-0ca739031580@att.net> <vklumc$3htmt$1@dont-email.me>
 <c03cf79d-0572-4b19-ad92-a0d12df53db9@att.net>
 <n9CdnR02SsevtPL6nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <45a632ed-26cc-4730-a8dd-1e504d6df549@att.net> <vkpa98$dofu$2@dont-email.me>
 <3d2fe306aa299bc78e94c14dadd21645d8db9829@i2pn2.org>
 <vkr8sq$t59a$2@dont-email.me>
 <d4669f26483b01c8a43dfd3ac4b61ab4a42bf551@i2pn2.org>
 <vksikk$17fjt$1@dont-email.me>
 <aa2941e93e806f1dda55d563dd062db67eb879f1@i2pn2.org>
 <vktmi3$1ia1u$1@dont-email.me>
 <c46775b30460bc564b3fe7bd1b838713829024f8@i2pn2.org>
 <vkv3t1$1qb93$1@dont-email.me>
 <2163aa0c0efba66c813e8ebda5ef5ece6d19ea34@i2pn2.org>
 <vl1901$2b0qi$1@dont-email.me>
 <4441753d454842cfa2efde51b362ca5d36937a48@i2pn2.org>
 <vl5toq$39tut$3@dont-email.me>
 <a0da5ca26a5980926daade6a595ed302ba5f05ba@i2pn2.org>
 <vl6hod$3ecap$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2025 19:47:41 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="1700256"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
In-Reply-To: <vl6hod$3ecap$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2683
Lines: 27

On 1/2/25 12:18 PM, WM wrote:
> On 02.01.2025 14:22, Richard Damon wrote:
>> On 1/2/25 6:36 AM, WM wrote:
>>> On 01.01.2025 03:03, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yes, SOME of the properties of the set come from properties of its 
>>>> members,
>>>
>>> What property does not?
> 
>> Like being infinite.
> 
> Mistake. An infinite set needs infinitely many elements.
> 
> Regards, WM
> 

Which it does. There are an infinite number of finite numbers.

I guess you are admitting to your stupidity.

(F you think there are only a finite number of Natural Numbers, then 
what is that number?

What every you want to say, why is that + 1 a number, and thus there are 
more Natural Numbers then you think.