Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joes <noreply@example.org>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers
 (extra-ordinary, effectively)
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2025 12:26:44 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <370747c3f34e9ee5e26b0a42ac9d54346a402472@i2pn2.org>
References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me> <vk8tbq$j9h1$1@dont-email.me>
	<bd7dfdc7-6471-4fe6-b078-0ca739031580@att.net>
	<vklumc$3htmt$1@dont-email.me>
	<c03cf79d-0572-4b19-ad92-a0d12df53db9@att.net>
	<n9CdnR02SsevtPL6nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com>
	<45a632ed-26cc-4730-a8dd-1e504d6df549@att.net> <vkpa98$dofu$2@dont-email.me>
	<3d2fe306aa299bc78e94c14dadd21645d8db9829@i2pn2.org>
	<vkr8sq$t59a$2@dont-email.me>
	<d4669f26483b01c8a43dfd3ac4b61ab4a42bf551@i2pn2.org>
	<vksikk$17fjt$1@dont-email.me>
	<aa2941e93e806f1dda55d563dd062db67eb879f1@i2pn2.org>
	<vktmi3$1ia1u$1@dont-email.me>
	<c46775b30460bc564b3fe7bd1b838713829024f8@i2pn2.org>
	<vkv3t1$1qb93$1@dont-email.me>
	<2163aa0c0efba66c813e8ebda5ef5ece6d19ea34@i2pn2.org>
	<vl1901$2b0qi$1@dont-email.me>
	<4441753d454842cfa2efde51b362ca5d36937a48@i2pn2.org>
	<vl5toq$39tut$3@dont-email.me> <vl64q8$3c170$1@dont-email.me>
	<vl6ig1$3ecap$4@dont-email.me>
	<2a9ace418f6cb97706e63eb54ed6ad773a09a36a@i2pn2.org>
	<vl88m6$3qtjc$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2025 12:26:44 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="1802568"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM";
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2604
Lines: 18

Am Fri, 03 Jan 2025 09:55:34 +0100 schrieb WM:
> On 02.01.2025 20:47, Richard Damon wrote:
>> On 1/2/25 12:30 PM, WM wrote:
>>> On 02.01.2025 14:37, FromTheRafters wrote:
>>>> WM was thinking very hard :
>>>>> On 01.01.2025 03:03, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, SOME of the properties of the set come from properties of its
>>>>>> members,
>>>>> What property does not?
>>>> Size, for one thing.
>>> Size is the number of elements.
>> WHich is a property of the set, but not the individual members.
> A property of its members.
Fuck no. The size of {1, 2, 4} is not a member.

-- 
Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:
It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.