Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers
 (extra-ordinary, effectively)
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2025 18:12:52 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <vl95qk$3vk27$3@dont-email.me>
References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me>
 <bd7dfdc7-6471-4fe6-b078-0ca739031580@att.net> <vklumc$3htmt$1@dont-email.me>
 <c03cf79d-0572-4b19-ad92-a0d12df53db9@att.net>
 <n9CdnR02SsevtPL6nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <45a632ed-26cc-4730-a8dd-1e504d6df549@att.net> <vkpa98$dofu$2@dont-email.me>
 <3d2fe306aa299bc78e94c14dadd21645d8db9829@i2pn2.org>
 <vkr8sq$t59a$2@dont-email.me>
 <d4669f26483b01c8a43dfd3ac4b61ab4a42bf551@i2pn2.org>
 <vksikk$17fjt$1@dont-email.me>
 <aa2941e93e806f1dda55d563dd062db67eb879f1@i2pn2.org>
 <vktmi3$1ia1u$1@dont-email.me>
 <c46775b30460bc564b3fe7bd1b838713829024f8@i2pn2.org>
 <vkv3t1$1qb93$1@dont-email.me>
 <2163aa0c0efba66c813e8ebda5ef5ece6d19ea34@i2pn2.org>
 <vl1901$2b0qi$1@dont-email.me>
 <4441753d454842cfa2efde51b362ca5d36937a48@i2pn2.org>
 <vl5toq$39tut$3@dont-email.me> <vl64q8$3c170$1@dont-email.me>
 <vl6ig1$3ecap$4@dont-email.me>
 <2a9ace418f6cb97706e63eb54ed6ad773a09a36a@i2pn2.org>
 <vl88m6$3qtjc$3@dont-email.me>
 <4305026e699bfc557f4bd7c2a0d32330f3ae0b3d@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2025 18:12:52 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="01d51636a443c1100d6c37c2b77ce98b";
	logging-data="4182087"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19HQdOrraCVLwCAHN9D5RU4poqO3mYm0ws="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:hm2pyvPLaZa52IEW4Rm2TD4QOm0=
In-Reply-To: <4305026e699bfc557f4bd7c2a0d32330f3ae0b3d@i2pn2.org>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2348

On 03.01.2025 15:49, Richard Damon wrote:

> But the members taken collectively *IS* the set.

Yes. The members taken individually are lacking great parts of the set.
∀n ∈ ℕ_def: |ℕ \ {1, 2, 3, ..., n}| = ℵo
ℕ \ {1, 2, 3, ...} = { }

Regards, WM