Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Tim Rentsch
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: transpiling to low level C
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2024 17:39:52 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 36
Message-ID: <86o713dvo7.fsf@linuxsc.com>
References: <86ikrdg6yq.fsf@linuxsc.com> <20241222002032.0000104c@yahoo.com> <20241222021851.0000059f@yahoo.com> <20241222030451.00005565@yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2024 02:39:53 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="175d13363d069c69169282e3d646d5d4";
logging-data="935447"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/gYwYptSGrA4tPehAjJ+uoN1ZCKb9Px1Y="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:VvM3bazPjyrmymhVJkc+Z1pvXx8=
sha1:hUTqdLIkUkTw/z3X9wtbUgg30hk=
Bytes: 2820
Janis Papanagnou writes:
> On 22.12.2024 02:04, Michael S wrote:
>
>>> [...]
>>
>> Part of the answer is in your previous response.
>> You wrote: "many _good_ professors I met in my life typically were
>> keen to explain their theses, statements, or knowledge (instead of
>> dragging that out of him)". You essentially admitted that not all good
>> professors behave like that.
>
> Oh, what I meant to express was different; that good professors
> *would* explain it (only bad ones wouldn't).
>
> (At least that was my experience; and not only covering the CS
> domain, BTW.)
>
>> [ "schools of teaching" stuff snipped ]
>>
>> You make an impression of one that received basics of CS. Probably, 40
>> or so years ago, but still you have to know basic facts. Unlike me, for
>> example.
>> So, Tim expects that you will be able to utilizes his hints.
>
> The point [repeatedly] stated (also by others here) was that
> he more often than not just provides no information but simple
> arbitrary statements of opinion.
The comments I made here, in two responses to postings of yours,
were not statements of opinion but statements of fact. They are
no more statements of opinion than a statement about whether the
Riemann Hypothesis is true is a statement of opinion. Someone
might wonder whether an assertion "The Riemann Hypothesis is
true" is true or false, but it is still a matter of fact, not a
matter of opinion.