Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: What is wrong with malloc? (Was: So You Think You Can Const?)
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2025 11:52:12 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 7
Message-ID: <86jzb584nn.fsf@linuxsc.com>
References: <vljvh3$27msl$1@dont-email.me> <vlle1n$2n1b0$1@dont-email.me> <vlm2tg$2dkpd$3@dont-email.me> <vlm8gd$2rfbl$2@dont-email.me> <vlma2d$2qolo$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2025 20:52:13 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="6e19b66cb0c542b6b8c649f7413a0cd9";
	logging-data="3071468"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19r6kVJFjLeGxxpBWgJyhZ7Qtw0LciCMBo="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:XQx908ZC7XZMQRAfHqimoAqdEUU=
	sha1:5GhB6g5/1VNU3AXBa4bN7M9KxOA=
Bytes: 1415

Phillip <nntp@fulltermprivacy.com> writes:

> C89 and C90 are better for 8-bit systems then C99 and newer.  Not
> that you can't do 8-bit on C99 but it's just not designed as well
> for it since C99 assumes you've moved on to at least 16-bit.

Which parts of the C99 standard support this assertion?