Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Bonita Montero Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Opinions on `defer`? Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2025 13:03:12 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 14 Message-ID: References: <87y0znpik1.fsf@gmail.com> <86sept85nz.fsf@linuxsc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2025 13:03:12 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org; posting-host="e90289cafe487ae667c38d1de34d51f9"; logging-data="655833"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19xYR4xvbEHa/rpa+mjJ2glI0fQRf7ufzA=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:ZAcbLZqlO4Q6Zuuv5sdr+a+pxfI= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: de-DE Bytes: 1803 Am 10.01.2025 um 16:06 schrieb Scott Lurndal: > Bonita Montero writes: >> Am 09.01.2025 um 19:23 schrieb Scott Lurndal: >> >>> I don't find the 'defer' proposal readable and I suspect it >>> may lead to more maintainability issues that simple gotos. >> >> It has the same readability like a scope_guard. >> > > Thank you for making my point. A scope-guard isn't badly readable.