Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: bp@www.zefox.net Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech Subject: Re: Suspension losses Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2025 01:45:49 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 20 Message-ID: References: Injection-Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2025 02:45:50 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="2480a1bfec8b692144da06484b6ea9aa"; logging-data="3781197"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+7WvJjElJuKyZi1bLZ+bKMLn1NGChEK6M=" User-Agent: tin/2.6.4-20241224 ("Helmsdale") (FreeBSD/14.2-STABLE (arm64)) Cancel-Lock: sha1:pl3E1RfXxZ90Pq3SvXXi9QhZuAg= Bytes: 1695 Frank Krygowski wrote: > > One further thought: If we accept (as I do) that jiggling the human > pedaler does cause loss in energy and speed, why aren't we all using > saddles with some sort of damped springing? > > I know suspension seatposts exist, but even those are not popular on > road bikes. I'm using a suspension seatpost now, removed from a town bike. It's slightly more comfortable. No idea if it's more efficient. Certainly heavier, probably lossy unless I balance pedal effort to keep pressure on the saddle constant. That difference is small at most. Thanks for writing, bob prohaska >