Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: mhx@iae.nl (mhx) Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth Subject: Re: single-xt approach in the standard Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 09:32:35 +0000 Organization: novaBBS Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="3120997"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="t0bSWFIQDvYvkkhDiPIIv6byulC6WbSEwXWMJpxc4k0"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$hVhODEi6iDm6G6KOEvSADubPEb1zhpzNQVkkZVwYTvb82a8TytTQG X-Rslight-Posting-User: 59549e76d0c3560fb37b97f0b9407a8c14054f24 Bytes: 1582 Lines: 18 On Mon, 23 Sep 2024 8:36:10 +0000, albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl wrote: > In article , > Ruvim wrote: [..] >> 1 constant a >> 1 constant b >> ' a ' b = . >> >>It is possible for a standard system to print "-1" when interpreting >>this program. > > I have a hard time with this. I can't argue with the standard however. > "I cringe that this is in the standard." Why? 'a' and 'b' are user defined words, '=' is a standard word, and 'true' is the expected outcome. -marcel