Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: minforth@gmx.net (minforth) Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth Subject: Re: VALUE and TO implementation Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2024 09:55:18 +0000 Organization: novaBBS Message-ID: References: <2af79ef5abcec71a1d42a461b6bc56b8@www.novabbs.com> <2024Jul31.193344@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <2024Aug1.120730@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="1307040"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="0+ejqm+s29REto3A2x2P4fP+XaUXf51pZgtYBR0nEqI"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 X-Rslight-Posting-User: d2a19558f194e2f1f8393b8d9be9ef51734a4da3 X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$Ot/mMxys05y95QiN4lNvuuCza63Y8VU9axZDs2.Vckoffxard6Fh2 Bytes: 1526 Lines: 6 TO is not part of the CORE wordset, and the standard has no normative parts - only compliance requirements, which do not include TO. See standard section 5. So language lawyering seems rather insubstantial here. Don't nail your own foot to the floor...