Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 00:52:13 +1000
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth
References: <v5fjkr$1p13i$1@dont-email.me> <v5t1ui$sl14$1@dont-email.me>
 <v5tral$10nj0$1@dont-email.me> <v5tvgj$11700$2@dont-email.me>
 <nnd$069e1986$0db5c9f1@ca369b5cec6780f4> <v612rt$1m2mj$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-GB
From: dxf <dxforth@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <v612rt$1m2mj$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
NNTP-Posting-Host: news.ausics.net
Message-ID: <6684141e@news.ausics.net>
Organization: Ausics - https://newsgroups.ausics.net
Lines: 16
X-Complaints: abuse@ausics.net
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.bbs.nz!news.ausics.net!not-for-mail
Bytes: 1415

On 3/07/2024 12:29 am, sjack wrote:
> albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl wrote:
>> I have a minimal system and opt out of the "optional search order wordset".
>> So SET-ORDER is not present.
>> What gives?
>>
> 
> I long back opt out the search order wordset. It just gave me
> management concerns. I use SCRs instead and keep requrements 
> external to the files. Life has been much smoother since.

Yep.  Went back to pre ALSO/ONLY schemes.  Every 'feature' just
creates more things to manage.

'Forthers have complicated every simple gift of Moore' - Diogenes