Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp Message-ID: JNTP-Route: nemoweb.net JNTP-DataType: Article Subject: Re: Newton: Photon falling from h meters increase its energy. References: <4af374770bb67b6951ef19c75b35fbad@www.novabbs.com> <181a583f1cd5cda6$86779$1316151$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <3zLm3mDTMPtyf6dcZJW5ew_XWEA@jntp> <181a5e0c344e8261$86735$1324994$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <181a5eb81e767dc4$86737$1324994$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <181a6036c3d29170$90809$1329657$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <181a63878c3a598f$86738$1324994$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity JNTP-HashClient: _EDXadx3ONwapmDoNQtfuXf1F9Y JNTP-ThreadID: 4af374770bb67b6951ef19c75b35fbad@www.novabbs.com JNTP-Uri: http://www.nemoweb.net/?DataID=jifh8z9kBXJpfBLJBNHCj0M6zfo@jntp User-Agent: Nemo/1.0 JNTP-OriginServer: nemoweb.net Date: Tue, 14 Jan 25 10:23:13 +0000 Organization: Nemoweb JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:109.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/115.0 Injection-Info: nemoweb.net; posting-host="cdcf91e3472b50c760e8dcbe4a2750ed9830a543"; logging-data="2025-01-14T10:23:13Z/9174313"; posting-account="190@nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com" JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1 JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96 From: Python Bytes: 4953 Lines: 93 Le 14/01/2025 à 00:14, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : > W dniu 13.01.2025 o 23:14, Python pisze: >> Le 13/01/2025 à 23:13, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : >>> W dniu 13.01.2025 o 22:58, Python pisze: >>>> Le 13/01/2025 à 22:45, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : >>>>> W dniu 13.01.2025 o 22:40, Python pisze: >>>>>> Le 13/01/2025 à 22:33, Demented maniac, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : >>>>>>> W dniu 13.01.2025 o 20:50, Python pisze: >>>>>>>> Le 13/01/2025 à 20:47, Idiotic kook Maciej Wozniak a écrit : >>>>>>>>> W dniu 13.01.2025 o 20:31, Python pisze: >>>>>>>> .. >>>>>>>>>> Einstein deserved the Nobel Prize for *numerous* reasons: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Whatever you say - Poincare had enough wit >>>>>>>>> to understand how idiotic rejecting Euclid >>>>>>>>> would be, and he has written it clearly >>>>>>>>> enough for anyone able to read >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Even you admitted that Poincaré would likely have kicked you in >>>>>>>> the a** >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Wozniak. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No, I didn't. A lie as usual. >>>>>> >>>>>> You did. Amnesia now? >>>>> >>>>> No, I didn't As you insist - maybe it's >>>>> rather a delusion than a lie. Woll, both >>>>> very possible. >>>> >>>> Anyway you did. >>> >>> Nope. As said - either a lie or a delusion. >>> Both typical for a relativistic idiot in general >>> and for you especially. >>> >>>> >>>>>>> See,  - I've proven the mumble of your idiot >>>>>>> guru to be inconsistent, and you can do nothing about it >>>>>> >>>>>> There is nothing to do as you've never done anything like. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Yes, I did, I've pointed directly 2 denying >>>>> themself predictions of his,  physics. >>>> >>>> You didn't, they're laughable nonsense. >>> >>> Of course they are, they're consequences >>> of the physics of your idiot guru. >>> >>> >>> >>>> Only you were screaming. You got precise refutations of you silly >>> >>> Nope, I've got some utterly ridiculous >>> assertions, extremly stupid even considering >>> the usual level of the Shit's worshippers. >>> Well,  nothing more was ever expected, of >>> course. It's changing nothing, the mumble >>> of your idiot guru was not even consistent, >>> it's been proven and a fanatic piece of shit >>> screaming "NOOOOO!!!" spitting and slandering is >>> changing nothing. Sorry. >> >> If it were a proof how come nobody but you recognizes it as such? > > Nobody is expecting a bunch of > fanatic idiots to recognize and accept > a proof that their divine guru was just > a mumbling crazie. > Expecting something like that from > a bunch of brainwashed fanatics wouldn't > be wise, would it? A proof is a human production, right? As long as an alleged one is not considered valid by a significant community outside of its author it is not a proof. There are not a single person on Earth, so far, that has publicly considered your "work" as a valid proof, right? As far as I can say ALL people who have expressed a judgement on your "work" consider it as completely asinine. You can insult people, it doesn't change the fact that what you have nothing like a proof. Not even remotely. You don't even try seriously to convince people.