Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: john larkin Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: BAW Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2025 10:56:49 -0800 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 24 Message-ID: References: <1vptojlpiellv6m47bnjtfblv4u1sa9u05@4ax.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2025 19:52:54 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="4977a01bf867f48ab656232174896fbc"; logging-data="336132"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/+i3jc2KvcuOfO9xjPMiIu" User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 Cancel-Lock: sha1:vtEjSaddHeIIkzcTO5NDw72F/qI= Bytes: 1646 On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 16:22:02 -0800, john larkin wrote: >On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 20:19:09 +0000, John R Walliker > wrote: > >>On 20/01/2025 18:36, john larkin wrote: >>> https://www.ti.com/product/CDC6C >>> >>> These are like 35 cents at 1K. >>> >>They look very nice, but where do you see such low prices? >>Certainly not at Mouser or Digikey. >> >>John >> > >That's the 1K price on the TI page. Maybe 1/3 the price of a junky XO. > > This has got to crush the XO business. It looks like it's a single chip that's encapsulated like any other IC. XOs are complex and need hermetic cans.