Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Anthony Howe Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth Subject: Re: Toad using many vocabularies Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2024 11:08:20 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 28 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2024 16:08:19 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="6bb1ef6bb18d026bf61c7eee4edbe40a"; logging-data="3459973"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+C/aPr9OQXNj3KFnMttR/D" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:FbWwI63Von5acIMlmaFIEGXr3L4= Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: Bytes: 2208 On 2024-11-01 10:28, Ruvim wrote: > Such a syntax is used in SP-Forth/4 since 2001, in the form :: or > :::: > > Where is a word that returns wid, or a word that is created with > `vocabulary`. > > This syntax in SP-Forth probably came after C++ "::" operator, introduced in > 1998.  The same operator was in C# from its initial release in 2000. > > The dot "." operator for accessing nested packages in Java was introduced in 1995. > > In Forth, a dot is often used as part of plain names, so it was less suitable as > a namespace separator. Yep. Bad idea to use dot. Never liked `::`, found it visually distasteful. Dare I suggest C's `->` which trumps others by decades. Or simply create a new one like `:>` or `~` (oh I'll be stoned for this one). I would prefer a single character, but there are so few good choices. -- Anthony C Howe achowe@snert.com BarricadeMX & Milters http://nanozen.snert.com/ http://software.snert.com/